Practice Areas:
Experienced Business lawyer with an emphasis in Corporate, Intellectual Property and Estate Planning Law. Education: Hofstra University School of Law (J.D. 1989) Editor of the Law Review
|
Mark J. Seelig
Mark also has extensive experience representing new media and technology clients. He has personally negotiated over 400 software development, licensing and/or distribution deals. Since 1989, he has represented technology companies in connection with many of the legal issues related to their businesses, including the preparation of appropriate business protection agreements, stock option and phantom stock plans, contract negotiations for vendor and supply agreements, and a wide array of general and entertainment contract matters. He regularly assists business owners in the preparation and implementation of estate plans and lectures on estate and tax planning for business owners. Recent representative transactions: represented owners in sale of financial services company to public company acquirer for over $200,000,000; represented world renowned author in multiyear master license and development deal for multimedia, videogames and online media properties; represented 40% owner in sale to majority partner of entire interest in international pharmaceutical clinical trials company; represented CEO and founder in sale of drug label company to public acquirer for over $100,000,000; represented numerous videogame and multimedia companies in numerous licensing and development deals, including the development of a television series to coincide with launch of licensed properties; represented fast growing education software company in preferred round of finance for nearly $20,000,000; represented financial, media and other software companies in numerous acquisitions and rounds of finance between $1,000,000 and $20,000,000; represented purchaser in distress sale of $11,000,000 of secured bank debt against company in the metals industry; represented joint venture partners in negotiation of venture deal for acquisition of over $100,000,000 in residential and commercial real estate; represented athletes and entertainers in videogame and license deals for numerous consumer products; represented multimedia company in angel round financing in excess of $25,000,000; represented investors in numerous restaurant deals; represented numerous videogame developers in contract negotiations for development of software titles, license agreements, financings, technology license agreements, and the sale of business interests; represented entrepreneurs and entertainers in the creation and development of tax strategies and estate plans and lectured on various aspects of estate and wealth transfer issues; represented long time business partners in various corporate divorce/dissolution issues. In 1986, Mr. Seelig graduated from Fordham University and in 1989 received his JD from Hofstra University School of Law, where he served as an Editor of the Law Review and was elected to present the Graduation Address on behalf of the graduating class. He was formerly associated with the international law firm of Rogers & Wells (now Clifford Chance) in New York and California. Mr. Seelig is admitted to practice in New York and California, and is a name partner in the Los Angeles based law firm of Chassman & Seelig, LLP. He is a founding partner of Meister Seelig & Fein, LLP, the firm's managing partner and a member of the Firm's executive committee. In addition to MSF, Mark is an active investor and owner in numerous business ventures including restaurants, real estate, technology and insurance companies. Mark is involved in charitable ventures and regularly donates his time and resources to worthwhile causes. He lives in Westchester, New York with his wife, Valerie, and their three daughters. Contact: |
Home | About Us | Practice Areas | Attorneys | News | Resources | Contact Us
© 2010 Meister Seelig & Fein LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a client-lawyer relationship.